ObamaCare

Letters' To President Barack Obama

Dear President:

Writing letters and letter campaigns have been an essential promise, supporters and staffers have enjoyed. The battle that looms the mission on changing the political landscape; has had its dents. GOP leadership is once again mounting an insubordinate approach to domestic issues.

Issues that affect the lives of ordinary American citizens. As their bait and switch tactics are in full stream. They are making claims that the individual mandate on Affordable Care Act; would be costly; as if the premiums on that mandate will cause prices to go up. Which is completely false allegations in what they call Obamacare! Your presidency's signature legislative land mark; was the incorporation on a corporate single payer system. Were the employer must pick the cost on their employees' health coverage.

The GOP misdirection; or switch the point of view tactics are old and inconsistent with what this country is trying to do by moving forward. By making small businesses owners and others believe that the rates on Taxes will increase; thus making the individual corporate mandate more expensive. Which is further off base and centralized on false notions than what health care facts have been dictating.

Companies of all income brackets if they have 25 full-time employees' operating into a single payer system; will get 100% tax incentives in forms of a deduction or tax Credits. And as long as the employee pays the co-payments on their premiums; the cost of this individual corporate Affordable health Care, will decrease. Those are factual evidence and modeled formula that businesses have been using in the market exchange.  It's a growth model that many enterprises use when balancing liquidity and non-tangible payments. And the banter in the previous years normally was; government should be ran like a business -- in this model everything that would take a corporate model by making health care cost effective.

Therefore by being cost effective; a person who is paying HealthCare premiums will in fact see their premiums decrease, even those who have their own packages. Why? The notion of having more people into the streaming pool; for health care companies to bid on -- will in fact lower premiums on those in that age group. And allowing companies to pick up a percentage; while using the Department of Treasury's Internal Revenue Services, an institution can recoup 100% of the cost to them on Health Care; by simply filling out the proper tax forms. This will keep cost low for the taxpayer, and it will allow business to replenish loses they've paid into -- on a quarterly basis. Using this system, allows Government to pay into a program; it keeps the cost lower for the consumer and it makes it affordable for everyone to participate.

Now we come to the conclusion, or pragmatic theory on how this will work; plus how will it affect the average taxpayer. Using a mirror system used in the stock exchange of a three source of liquidity. Where there's a chart of a three streams of cash flow coming in for example: Consumer pays retail price; merchant pays discounted bulk price; and government subsidized the production -- works. It's a business model that has been proven to work on all levels. So how can this model be placed in a bipartisan system, were the consumer pays the premiums for health care. The merchant, which is the corporate institution pays the bulk of health care. And the government replenishes such entities through the Department of Treasury's Internal Revenue Services.

How will this formula keep cost down; one modern way is to mandate that majority of the country's population; not participating must be included? The more streams of cash, into a proposal the cheaper that proposal will become. How will this formula benefit companies or institutions? This will allow an entity to purchase packages at a bulk rate, with more consumer a.k.a. Employees at the bargaining table. Which means more people will be covered; paying less on their premiums, in a single payer system that the entity picks up the remaining tab.

How does this benefit the company's balance sheet? When an entity files their quarterly tax statements such company, can file corporate liabilities; plus recoup damages through America's corporate tax system. Since the rates for an entity is much lower than the average taxpayer. And through our commerce laws, corporate deductibles and credits don't effect the taxpayers -- since it’s a different system for entities than it would be for the average taxpayer.

How will this help Government’s liability? It's plain and simple. By moving the liability from the individual tax payer system, and into the commerce liability system. Mines, and your taxes will decrease dramatically. It means that less taxes on public services; since we won't be paying the heavy burden of un-sponsored system. A system where government indirectly paid large portions on everyone's health care. Too break it down, just a little further: People will be buying insurance at a rate more favorable to them, and they would be placed in a bracket pool of 25 or more people per bundle. It means the company or entity will be purchasing a packaged deal at bulk price; and getting subsidized for the losses through the commerce. As this will allow Government to fund balance sheets without raising taxes, premiums, and the effects of the liability through the individual tax payer. And it would also prevent government from paying for charity care, since it would mean more people are covered and less people in the emergency rooms.

What will a program like this do? It will take pressure off the government on paying for everything when it comes to someone's health. It would allow the person to be able to purchase and have low cost health care through their employers in a single payer system. It will help businesses and entities pay for it at cheaper rates, since it would be purchased in bulk. It will also allow the company or entity to recoup the liability through the corporate tax code.

Who sees the benefits? We all do, the public will be a little bit healthier, since more people will be paying into the system. The companies or entities will make a 15% profit on the liability losses at 100%. Government would see a 10% decrease in overall health care expenditures. The taxpayers will see a 10% decrease in overall personal taxes. As State Governments would be able to circumvent paying for Health Care off their budget analysis; and into a corporate system.

On paper and through trial and error, this formula is a win, win situation. So, why are we having this problem of Repeal Obamacare? We are having this problem based on respectability. The base called the GOP has no respect for you as a corporate supporter -- no interest in believing that public to private or private to public corporation can work in government. And if such a thing were to co-exist, it wouldn't comeout of a democratic voice. Plus the notion, where many believe it will raise taxes on corporate accounts, is false. These false beliefs have become the political grandstanding that's struck a GOP lead Congress to strike a vote to Repeal Obamacare 41 times. Which is one crazy voting for a single piece of legislation to be written into law; and have attempts to remove that P.S. Law.

They want to go back to seniors who shared pills due to a coverage default in the drug prescription part plan D. They want to go to overcrowded insurances, that turned while select few had the benefits need, at their expense through an unfair tax system.

Mr. President Barack Obama, the Affordable Patient Care Act; is what this country needs. It gives the public a single payer system ran by the government through corporate liabilities.  It lowers rates for the public to ensure everyone is covered. It lowers taxes in three ways, me and you since the government won't be picking up the tab. On corporate entities, since those balance sheets will see a profit instead of a blank note. And on government to the notion that the more people covered, the less people the government would have to pay for; since they'll be less people without insurance.

This letter comes to you asking for you to spend more political capital; more political theater on pointing out the falsehood, many of these followers holding leadership roles; they mimic.  Health Care isn't a political Football anyone can throw around, it’s an issue that harms the pocket books of families -- state governments, and the federal government duties on providing.